<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>NASA SMAP on Beyond the Joystick</title>
		<link>https://beyondthejoystick.space/tags/nasa-smap/</link>
		<description>Recent content in NASA SMAP on Beyond the Joystick</description>
		<generator>Hugo</generator>
		<language>en-us</language>
		
		
		
		
			<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2026 08:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
			<atom:link href="https://beyondthejoystick.space/tags/nasa-smap/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
			<item>
				<title>Beyond Reconstruction: Zero-Shot Anomaly Detection of Telemetry with TimeRCD</title>
				<link>https://beyondthejoystick.space/beyond-reconstruction-zero-shot-anomaly-detection-of-telemetry-with-timercd/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2026 08:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://beyondthejoystick.space/beyond-reconstruction-zero-shot-anomaly-detection-of-telemetry-with-timercd/</guid>
				<description>&lt;!-- wp:paragraph --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Telemetry monitoring in modern space systems, such as Martian rovers and Earth observation satellites, requires the real-time analysis of extremely high-dimensional data streams. These time-series signals are inherently affected by thermal noise and unpredictable radiative variations, making fault detection a critical computational bottleneck. As highlighted in our previous deep dives on &lt;a href=&#34;https://beyondthejoystick.space/generative-ai-rover-navigation-technical-analysis-of-claude-integration-on-mars/&#34; title=&#34;Generative AI Rover Navigation: Technical Analysis of Claude Integration on Mars&#34;&gt;on-board decision-making autonomy&lt;/a&gt;,interplanetary communication latency forces spacecraft to process and interpret anomalies locally, without waiting for a human feedback loop.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
